![]() ![]() We tested both single-threaded and multi-threaded performance here. This release also drops the OpenGL test, making Cinebench a pure CPU benchmark this time. The latest version of Maxon's rendering benchmark, Cinebench R20, takes longer to complete, so this is a better test of the machine's cooling system. That's not really what we expected from the Radeon Vega 6, but at this point Cinebench's OpenGL test is pretty long in the tooth, and it's unlikely that there are many optimizations outside of professional-grade drivers like AMD's WX series. On the OpenGL test, the Radeon scores about like every other integrated option here. In fact, this Lenovo system only trails the larger ThinkPad X1 Extreme by around 9%. This isn't exactly the kind of workload we'd expect out of a thin and light notebook, but this does show us that the system has plenty of multi-processing horsepower when it's necessary. As a result, Lenovo's ThinkPad X13 is by far the fastest ultraportable at Cinebench R15 - the systems above it in the chart are not what we'd consider ultraportables. The Ryzen CPU is faster than a Core i7-10710U in this test. All tests were performed using the latest version of Chrome. This test is a better example of how systems cope with real web applications, as opposed to a pure JavaScript compute test like JetStream. This test automatically loads and runs several sample webapps from using the most popular web development frameworks around, including React, Angular, Ember.js, and even vanilla JavaScript. We recently moved on to 's Speedometer test, which takes a holistic look at web application performance. Overall the storage subsystem is solid, and users will not likely ever be waiting on the SSD to get much done. That number drops predictably, since there's more writing or reading to each operation as sizes increase. ![]() Write speeds weren't too far behind, either, and 2 GB per second on large sequential writes is pretty solid.įrom an I/O standpoint, the drive performs more than adequately here, hitting right around 80,000 I/O operations per second on small reads and writes. We didn't expect a ton of performance out of a relatively small drive, but the ThinkPad X13 surprised us and we saw read speeds that could reach north of 3 GB per second. The ThinkPad X13 has a 256 GB Samsung PM981a, which is a PCI Express 3.0 NVMe drive in the typical M.2 2280 form factor. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.ATTO Disk Benchmark bandwidth, in bytes per secondĪTTO Disk Benchmark IO per second measurements Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. HP también incluye sólo 12 meses de garantía para su 355. Los compradores que opten por el modelo basado en AMD pueden ahorrar los 350 Euros ahorrados en un SSD y/o una mejora de garantía. ![]() A cambio hay que aceptar un rendimiento inferior de CPU, el cual sigue bastando para las tareas rutinarias. Eso es más de 200 Euros menos de lo que piden por el HP 350. Naturalmente lo que más nosgusta es el precio del portátil: 369 Euros por un portátil que viene con dos sistemas operativos (290 Euros sin sistemas Windows). En contraste con el HP 350, el modelo 355 model we tested does not have an mSATA slot. Su brillo, contraste y reproducción de color deberían ser (bastante) mejores. Como el modelo instalado en el HP 350, este último no resulta del todo convincente. Como corresponde a un dispositivo de oficina, también cuenta con un buen teclado y una pantalla mate. La gráfica incluso permite jugar a algún juego que otro. Ofrece un decente rendimiento de aplicación y puede dar una buena duración de batería. HP ha añadido un portátil de oficina de bajo coste bien pensado a su alineación. El HP 355 G2 es atractivo en términos generales. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |